Share this post:
This July, Gallup presented a new self-reported survey that revealed an engagement crisis at the workplace. They conveniently coined the term The Great Detachment, making it clear that this is the consequence of the Great Resignation. But what are the reasons for this boredom at work, and is there anything companies or HR authorities can do about it?
Read this short editorial in which we present three leading theories and cures by different publications.
According to Chloe Berger’s Fortune article published on Yahoo, the main cause is stagnation at work. Feeling checked out at work is a common symptom of something going wrong in an organization, but if 51% percent of the workplace is looking for something better, maybe the organization isn’t so much the problem as it is the whole system. At least, this is Berger’s train of thought.
Not only that, but 51% represents that there must be dissatisfaction at every level, from the young ones who never experienced any other work structure to managers. This brings even less certainty to younger workers, who feel like they’re “trudging along in a job they’re not all that invested in.” Though managers are often cited as a solution, they are also part of the demographic feeling detached from work.
This stagnation has more to do with the job market and lack of upward mobility than the job itself. Ben Wigert, co-author of the Gallup report, theorizes that since hirings have stopped, workers who moved during the pandemic and had big career or economic growth by hopping around now can’t just make another jump. This frustrates people who continue to “check in while being checked out.”
You might say that not moving around isn’t so bad. The pandemic and its job market were anomalies, but things haven’t stopped being anomalies, and in fact, that was the only time when they benefitted workers. Remote work’s wide acceptance began during the pandemic, while the next big trend was AI and its related layoffs as corporations clawed back whatever benefits the workers had acquired. The layoff survivors have been left demoralized and checked out, overworked in reduced teams, and fearful they might be next.
“Of those who left their jobs within this past year, 42% said their manager or company could have done something to stop them from quitting.”
The report points out that managers aren’t showing up for people. Communication is sparse, with 45% saying that they never had a constructive conversation with their bosses in which they could express dissatisfaction and their feelings.
In HR Reporter’s take, penned by Jim Wilson, they think that remote work is actually the cause of the Great Detachment. They argue that Gen Z is detached from work because they do everything online. According to HR Employer’s survey, the average online worker speaks to someone else only once a day.
They write that Gen Z has self-reported decreased verbal and social skills after prolonged isolation and limited in-person interactions during remote work. To them this means that there is a generational shift in which people who started working during or after the pandemic don’t have the same office skills as those who are more senior in their working life.
“So, give them opportunities to contribute their ideas, their opinions, their suggestions. It gives them more of a sense of ownership over the work that they’re doing and more of a connection with the company.”
According to Janet Candido, founder of Candido Consulting Group, the answer is to return to office and practice communication, specifically two-way communication. Part of the disengagement comes from feeling unimportant, so they say that there should be more participation, recognition, and feedback so Gen Z feels like they matter. If they are only going to the office to work, they might look for somewhere where they can work straight from home.
In Time Magazine’s interview with Vijay Pendakur, author of The Alchemy of Talent, Michelle Peng asked him about detached employees and how to ensure that engagement at work remains high.
“The secret has to do with preparing teams to navigate a dizzying rate of change with a combination of trust, connection, and belonging.”
Pendakur thinks that the way things have been changing and have continued to change has created “disruption fatigue.” People have rolled with the punches, have gotten back on their feet, and continued bringing results for companies, only to be met with more changes. The author points out that change is perceived as a threat on a neuroscience level. Naturally, people check out when it doesn’t ever stop.
They point out that teams that tend to thrive in uncertainty are those that outperform others in trust levels. To improve trust and make people feel like they belong and matter in a team, Pendakur has four steps to follow in his model “Inquire and Affirm”:
By following these four steps, a leader or a team member can position themselves as trustworthy and someone who will have their team’s back, even when they’re giving or getting feedback. This will help the team feel connected and heard by management. This brings us back to engaging the 45% of workers who say they’ve never had a conversation with their manager.
The Great Detachment is a real thing that has been building up for years now. Every little change from the pandemic has contributed to disengaging older generations and adopting new workers into this mindset. But it doesn’t have to be this way; it’s just that companies have to commit themselves to change.
Though beneficial for some workers, a return to the office doesn’t mean engagement will go up. It can be detrimental, as just doing the same work that can be done at home with no difference except for commuting can give rise to other anxieties. Instead, companies and managers should get ingenious when they call people back into the office, developing trust and a sense of belonging combined with recognition and feedback programs.
WHAT DO YOU NEED TO FIND?